"Blogging from Chicagoland to the Nations about the Hope and Wholeness of Jesus Christ!"

Follow codytibm on Twitter

Active Theism and the Atheist's Crutch

     The second point of the doctrine of creation is as follows:

 

2.  After creating the universe, God continued to be actively and intimately related to his creation.  That is to say that God is present and active in the whole universe and in our particular lives (cf. Gen. 1:4, 7-11, 14, 16-18, 20-22, 24-31, 2:1-3, 5-9, Isa. 41:17-20, 43:6-7; 45:7; 65:17; Eph. 2:10; Heb. 1:3).

 

     And when it really comes down to it, I think this is the main reason why many people are so adamantly opposed to the idea of intelligent design or the possibility that there could be a supreme being ruling over the universe.  Really, there must be some explanation for the astoundingly virulent attitudes of many of atheism’s greatest proponents.  Just take atheistic figurehead Richard Dawkin’s comments for example:

 

“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”   (Quoted on Dawkins sycophant Steve Wells’ blog from The God Delusion)

 

     So what’s the cause of all this outright hostility towards the idea of God and towards Christians in particular?  Natural selection? 

     No, I really think it has to do with the implications of point 2 of the doctrine of creation.  I’d be willing to bet that most of these guys (and gals) wouldn’t have very much at all to say about belief in an intelligent creator if that’s all there was to it.  After all, it’s not unusual for them to posit that very thing in the form of some kind of extraterrestrial “seeding” theory (here’s Dawkins on this).  If the creator simply “seeded” biological life on earth and then zipped away to some far off galaxy in their flying saucer, then well and good.  The problem is that the Bible teaches (and science really does affirm*) that God not only created at the beginning, but stuck around afterwards.

     This is the idea that sinful people (myself included before I met Christ) have always shuddered at.  The idea that there is an omnipotent God ruling over the entire universe and prying into your personal affairs is just pretty scary when you think about it.  Moreover, when it turns out that this God actually cares about things like right and wrong, holiness and obedience, love and justice – well, YIKES!  There is a sense in which Dawkins is right in calling God unpleasant.  For those who live their lives in enmity towards God, nothing could be more unpleasant than to realize that it all matters.

     It seems to me that atheism is the ultimate crutch for those who don’t want to face the fact that God sees and cares.   Atheists like Dawkins are on a boat to Tarshish, and what they don’t seem to understand is that sleeping in the cabin won’t make the storm go away. 

     We need to be ready and willing to try to persuade such people to believe in God and the salvation that he offers through his son, Jesus Christ (2 Cor. 5:11).  But we also must persistently pray for our atheistic friends and family that God will mercifully pursue them, granting them faith and repentance that leads to a life-giving knowledge of the truth (2 Tim. 2:25).

 

 

[*There is a good scientific discussion of this in The Case for a Creator.]

 

2 comments (Add your own)

1. trimtab wrote:
"And when it really comes down to it, I think this is the main reason why many people are so adamantly opposed to the idea of intelligent design or the possibility that there could be a supreme being ruling over the universe."

No. Sustained lack of evidence is the reason.

"So what’s the cause of all this outright hostility towards the idea of God and towards Christians in particular?"

No hostility, whatsoever. The Dawkins quotation you refer to is merely a reflection of what can me found in the bible, when judged from a modern moral point of view. Natural selection has nothing to do with. Read your bible, it's all there.

"I’d be willing to bet that most of these guys (and gals) wouldn’t have very much at all to say about belief in an intelligent creator if that’s all there was to it."

You would lose your bet. Scientists have many more questions to ask, and experiments to perform, in the eventuality that an intelligent entity is at the origin of said design. The problem is still the evidence, or lack thereof.

"For those who live their lives in enmity towards God, nothing could be more unpleasant than to realize that it all matters."

For your information, atheists don't feel "enmity" towards God, but rather "disbelief," as in "how could I possibly feel enmity toward a non-existent entity?"

What ticks off atheists is rather the contradictions in the stories contained in the bible, in the very nature attributed to your theistic entity, as well as the implications of the premisses you take for true.

"It seems to me that atheism is the ultimate crutch for those who don’t want to face the fact that God sees and cares"

No crutch or weakness implied here, for atheists don't believe in your "fact." Atheists instead display quite the opposite, i.e. courage. Being an adult implies being mature enough to live with doubt and uncertainty.

"But we also must persistently pray for our atheistic friends and family..."

Oh, please don't. Rather, do something more productive or useful.

January 18, 2009 @ 12:55 AM

2. Cody wrote:
Yikes, TT, too long for me. Let me pick highlights . . .

"No hostility, whatsoever."

Oh, come on. Dawkins is a pretty nasty guy.

"The Dawkins quotation you refer to is merely a reflection of what can me found in the bible, when judged from a modern moral point of view. Natural selection has nothing to do with. Read your bible, it's all there."

And I would challenge Dawkins on each point. He is woefully ignorant of Biblical theology and has a worldview the provides no ground for making moral judgments anyway.

The natural selection thing was a joke, but if I have to explain it . . .

"For your information, atheists don't feel "enmity" towards God, but rather "disbelief," as in "how could I possibly feel enmity toward a non-existent entity?""

You misunderstood me. I didn't mean the you necessarily feel conscious enmity towards God, but rather, the other way around. It's nothing personal and isn't something that is particularly an atheist thing. It is a separated from God thing. I was there too. It's Romans 5:10. We are (well, I was but am not anymore) in the position of enemies, but God still extends the opportunity for reconciliation through Jesus Christ.

TT: "What ticks off atheists is rather the contradictions in the stories contained in the bible, in the very nature attributed to your theistic entity, as well as the implications of the premisses you take for true."

Contradictions? Like what?

TT: "No crutch or weakness implied here, for atheists don't believe in your "fact." Atheists instead display quite the opposite, i.e. courage. Being an adult implies being mature enough to live with doubt and uncertainty."

Well, you say tomato, I say toMAHto.

And, I'll pray for you if I darn well want to. ;)

January 18, 2009 @ 3:42 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.


Click here to see all TIBM recommended books, films, and music.


If you are South Asian young adult in Chicagoland, help us out by taking this quick survey.

The Ramblings Archive Month by Month